About Me

Happy Go Lucky Kinda Stuff! Curious, atheist, lil-bit adventurous, lil-bit rebel, nature lover, sometimes feel like to read and travel. Writing is drug, minute observer, believe in instinct, in awesome profession/academics. Love my people and my pets and love to be surrounded by them.

Translate

Facebook Link

Twitter Link

Featured Post

Before Violence Week Correspondence, Happenings

Tuesday, July 9, 2019

I-8 (a-j) Sign and Provide Specific Documents

Meeting with committee members, as said earlier was not like it should had been. No mention of extreme form of surveillance abuse. No time to listen to that. That's not a related issue. Then what is related? Human breeding factories? They would wash away all sins and crimes?

This committee's focus as per their "printed statement given to me to sign" seemed just materialistic aspect. The strange aspect was, how anyone could enforce their words and narratives on you? It should not be even with some uneducated person and they were doing that with an educated person.

I found the same thing in real court also in some other cases. With time, it became indigestible their ways of fighting. These groups, parties rather say political parties have no care and concern for individual rights. No concern, what that person thinks and protesting against. To hell with that. Until and unless, you are that stubborn that I would not be that easy for you to deal that way, come what may. But then CoVID time and they said we care too hoots even for society.

Back to topic

Printed statement given to me to sign


Now that's known as legal statement and legal fights?

The way I wrote. The way kalaakars designed.

At first look it seems ok. But read carefully and you will find the problems. Such things happen when someone else write for you. On that I had been told that I can add to it whatever I feel like is not correct. 

But look at next page of asked documents/evidence


What is the meaning of incidence without any relation to big boss houses abusive surveillance? Becoming hurdles in professional and personal life at every step.
Even videos related to the incidence are self explanatory, the way this incidence has been staged.

But then there was something ".......same has been written as told voluntarily by me."
Maybe experts can explain better the way of selectivity. 
By taking such undertakings can institutes save their images and credibility even after becoming party to such crimes?

Correspondence and Meeting with Committee (Violence, H#16, Type-3, 10-4-2019)

First complain was to Vice Chancellor and Registrar on 12-4-2019.

Then I talked on phone to this committee members. I got their phone numbers from University website. I had been advised to send complaints, again, to this committee. Was not that VC or registrar office responsibility to forward those complaints to that committee? Oh! I forgot, if they had anything to do with responsibility and dignity of their chairs then this violence had not happened. It had not been organized crime at least. And no such thing could happen, for such a long time within campus, without the knowledge or involvement of  VC and registrar or security of that University. Even after that, at least some authority must had visited the place of this crime. But it was such an open and blunt abuse of chairs and powers that these people did not feel, that any such step is even important.

The feel was like "विकास नाम बन्दे का काम ही विनाश है" and others were there to support those designs.


Strange kinda delay tactics

                                    
                                          After much wait same complaint to UGC and AICTE

Finally, this committee woken? 
Got an Email on 2nd July or cryptic modeling was underway even here?



Meeting Notice for 9th July, 2019


What happened in that meeting?
I had been asked to narrate the incidence. I started narrating the incidence.
Someone interrupted and I had been asked to short cut, when I started informing about meetings with VC and registrar before this incidence and arguments with Dr. Vikas Siwach and Dr. Sajjan Dahiya, few days back. 
Then chairperson asked, why you went there?
I just started informing my campus house problems, including house16, Type-3 as that had been allotted to me in 2011 and I was living there till March 2017. I kept that as protest even later up to 2018. I had been enforced to give after Psycho control of September 2018. H#30, Type-4 allotment in itself was a conspiracy. 
I had been interrupted again and again and advised not to mention residences problems. They were not part of this inquiry. 

I was surprised after listening that. And I cut in-between that and answered, these big boss houses are problems for all problems. If these surveillance abuse problems had not been there then neither this incidence had happened nor this committee had been here. Neither they listened to me, nor I felt that this committee was there for the purpose, it should had been. 

And after sometime, I had been given a printed copy of I-J series to sign. I said, I have already sent my version via email on 12-4-2019. Why this printed version in this strange series? I can write myself. For that I don't need someone else wordings or narratives. But they insisted that I must sign that and can send later on addition or deletion regarding that via email. It was strange but I signed. I had been asked some specific documents only. That was also kinda selective version. Let the person send whatever that person feels is important as a proof of her narrative or version. But it was kinda enforcement designs. 

I-8 (a-j) Sign and Provide Documents


One more strange thing happened. Someone asked me, "Do you know उपासना?"
I heard that word somewhere but did not know what was that? Maybe someone name, but who is that? And what's the correlation with this case?
And this committee member said, "बच्चा उपासना किया करो".
I was like, -- what? What's that?
Oh! You have not heard. Kind of meditation, yoga. Heard that?
And I said, yes. 
I was feeling like this is not anti violence and sexual harassments against women at workplace committee but pro. 
You can notice such words even in my correspondence to this committee.

My response to this meeting was:
Asked Documents

Documents

Documents


Another interesting aspect about this committee was that I have not been provided whole complain against me. I had been informed that I will be provided that. But I had to request for the same again and again. 
There was mention of some video recording and detailed complain against me by Dr. Sajjan Dahiya in committee report but I had not been provided that even up to that time. I got that CD after this request.



And CD was not working. 
Then I requested again to provide the same.



And this CD was talking again about dramatic part of this staged crime. Discussion about that will be in some other post along with committee report points.